Diplomatic Engagement in AU-CARICOM Relations

This section explores diplomatic engagements between the African Union (AU) and the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) for the period 2002-2022.

With shared cultural, historical, and political backgrounds, the AU and CARICOM are well-positioned to foster strong diplomatic engagements that could contribute significantly to promoting mutual development between the two regions. 

The section begins by providing an overview of the key milestones and developments in the history of AU-CARICOM relations, emphasizing the timeline of events that have shaped this partnership since its inception. Following this, the following will examine the various diplomatic channels and platforms that enable effective communication and collaboration between the two organizations, which include bilateral meetings, joint initiatives, and regular dialogues. 

Table 1 presents a summary of diplomatic engagements between various CARICOM (Caribbean Community) countries and AU (African Union) countries. The list of CARICOM countries is provided along the left column, from Antigua and Barbuda to Trinidad and Tobago. The corresponding right column indicates AU countries with which each CARICOM country has diplomatic relations. The table aims to show the existing connections between these two regional organizations, highlighting the potential for stronger collaboration and partnership.

Table 1: Diplomatic Engagements between CARICOM and AU countries

CARICOM CountryAU  Countries with  which CARICOM Country has Diplomatic RelationsNotable Outcomes
Antigua and BarbudaAlgeria, Botswana, Cape Verde, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Libya, Morocco, RwandaAU-CARICOM Summit
The BahamasCameroon,Cape Verde, Côte D’Ivoire, Eswatini, Gambia, Ghana, Lesotho, Malawi, Maldives, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Zambia, ZimbabweAU-CARICOM Summit
BarbadosAlgeria, Angola, Botswana, Cabo Verde, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa, Tanzania, ZambiaAU-CARICOM Summit Barbados and Ghana signed an agreement 
BelizeAlgeria, Angola, Botswana, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tunisia, ZambiaAU-CARICOM Summit
DominicaAlgeria, Botswana, Cape Verde, Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Libya, Mauritius, Morocco, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, South Africa, Sudan, UgandaAU-CARICOM Summit
GrenadaRepublic of CongoAU-CARICOM Summit
GuyanaAlgeria, Angola, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Egypt, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, ZimbabweAU-CARICOM Summit Guyana and Ghana signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to strengthen their relationship, particularly in the petroleum sector. The MoU aims to facilitate knowledge exchange and cooperation between both countries in the area of oil and gas, as well as promote collaboration on technical assistance, training, and capacity-building efforts. The MoU also includes provisions for visa-free travel between the two countries, which is expected to enhance mutual understanding, cultural exchanges, tourism, and business ties.
HaitiBenin, Gabon, Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo, Côte D’Ivoire, Liberia, Libya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, South AfricaAU-CARICOM Summit
Jamaica Algeria, Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, ZimbabweAU-CARICOM Summit
Montserrat
AU-CARICOM Summit
Saint Kitts and NevisAlgeria, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Djibouti, Egypt, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Rwanda, Senegal, South Africa, Sudan, Togo, Uganda, ZimbabweAU-CARICOM Summit
Saint LuciaAlgeria, Cape Verde, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gambia, Kenya, Libya, Morocco, Namibia, Rwanda, Seychelles, South AfricaAU-CARICOM Summit
Saint Vincent & the GrenadinesAlgeria, Angola, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Liberia, Libya, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Namibia, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, South Africa, Tunisia, UgandaAU-CARICOM Summit
SurinameAlgeria, Angola, Botswana, Cape Verde, Djibouti, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eswatini, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Libya, Maldives, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, North Macedonia, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Zambia, ZimbabweAU-CARICOM Summit
Trinidad & TobagoAngola, Botswana, Cameroon, Ghana, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Zambia, ZimbabweAU-CARICOM Summit

An analysis of the table reveals the following key points:

  1. Diplomatic connections exist between a majority of CARICOM and AU countries, indicating a broad network of relations.
  2. The number of diplomatic relations between individual CARICOM and AU countries varies, with some CARICOM countries like Antigua and Barbuda having diplomatic ties with 10 AU countries, while others such as Jamaica have diplomatic relations with 29 AU countries.
  3. Some AU countries feature more frequently as partners to CARICOM countries (e.g., Algeria, Egypt, Rwanda, and South Africa) while others have fewer connections (e.g., Djibouti, Eritrea, and  Lesotho).

From this analysis, it can be concluded that although a framework for political partnership between CARICOM and AU countries currently exists, these diplomatic engagements appear not to be massaged to their full potential. There appears to be no significant outcome from the diplomatic engagements, indicating potential for improvement in the relationships. Proper utilization of these diplomatic connections could lead to advantages for both regions in terms of regional integration, trade, development, and collective bargaining for shared goals and interests. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *